PIL to Ban i-pill dismissed by the Supreme Court of India

March 2nd, 20101:11 am @    


i-pillThe Supreme Court of India refused to entertain an appeal seeking ban on emergency contraceptive pill, “i-pill” manufactured by Cipla Ltd. The petitioners had contended that the particular product violates the provisions of Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. The Hon’ble Court took this stand on January 18th 2010.

Krupa Prolifiers, Kerala based Charitable foundation had filed an PIL (Public Interest Litigation) contending that i-pill manufactured by Cipla is not an contraception pill but an abortion pill. Abortions in India are illegal per se under MTP Act. The counsel for the trust- MP Raju said that the pill takes effect after the fertilization whereas a contraceptive does not allow fertilization. Hence, i-pill is an abortion pill not a contraceptive as it terminates pregnancy. Cipla on the other hand held on to the submission that life begins only after implantations.

The full bench comprising of Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan and Justices R V Raveendran and Deepak Verma did not accept the submission of the petitioner and declared that it is baseless on scientific grounds. The bench also mentioned that the government must have had strong reasons to permit over the counter sale of i-pill. They further said that it will spread scare among people as such measures are part of daily life.

“You do not have a case where it has been misused. We will not even consider entertaining the PIL as it could scare people”. The bench said.

Article by

Co-Founder and Editor of MightyLaws.in. She has obtained BA.LLB(Hons) degree from National Law Institute University, Bhopal and currently resides in New Delhi. She strongly believes that increasing legal awareness is the key to ensure social justice and simplification of law is the means to achieve it.

Connect with her on Twitter and Facebook.

Enter your Email Address to Get Similar Articles in your Inbox Free!

  

MightyLaws is not responsible or liable for the views expressed by the authors. The articles are general information and should not be treated as legal advice. Please read the Disclaimer for further clarifications.